Introduction
Shaikh ul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah said:
If it is said: If absolute Iman includes all that Allah and His Messenger 
commanded, then, if some of the Iman diminishes, the sinners must be charged 
with unbelief as the Kharjites claimed, or abide forever in Hell and be deprived 
of Iman, as the Mu’tazilites claimed. The claims of the Kharijites and 
the Mu’tazilites were more erroneous than the claims of the 
Murji’ites. For there is a group among the Murji'ites who were 
considered good and praiseworthy people. However, the Kharijites and the 
Mu’tazilites were condemned by the consensus of the Orthodox Muslim 
community. It is said: It should be known that the views of 
Mu’tazilites and Kharijites, with which none of the Orthodox Muslims 
agreed, implied that the people who committed major sins would abide forever in 
Hell. This claim was one of the important innovations because the Companions 
and Successors of the Prophet  (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam), their followers, and all religious Muslims 
agreed that whoever has an atom's weight of Iman in his heart will not abide 
forever in Hell. They also agreed that our Prophet  (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) would be among 
those who would intercede to seek Allah's permission for His intercession for 
the major sinners from his community. Indeed, both Sahih Muslim and Sahih 
Bukhari relate that the Prophet  (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) said: "Every prophet is allowed one 
answered prayer. As for me, I delayed my request in order to intercede for my 
community on Judgment Day."
Shaikh al-Albani , asked concerning the book, "Dhahiratul-Irjaa fil-Fikr 
al-Islami" of Safar al-Hawali, and in this book takfir is performed on 
account of certain sins, replied:
"I gave my viewpoint on a matter about thirty or so years ago when I 
used to be in the [Isamic] University (of Madinah) and I was asked in a 
gathering about my opinion on Jamaa’at ut-Tabligh. So I said on that day, 
‘They are the Sufis of this era’. And now it has occurred to me 
that I should say about this Jamaa’ah who have emerged in the present 
times and who have opposed the Salaf, I say here, in accordance with the 
statement of al-Hafidh adh-Dhahabi: They have opposed the Salaf in much of the 
issues of manhaj, and it is befitting that I label them the Khawarij of the era. 
And this resembles their emergence at the current time – in which we read 
their statements – because they, in reality, their words take the 
direction and objective of that of the Khawarij in performing takfir of the one 
who commits major sins. And perhaps I should say, this is either due to 
ignorance on their behalf or due to devised plot!! And I say this in light of 
[the statement of Allaah], "Let not the hatred of a people make you depart 
from justice. Be just and fair and that is closer to taqaa". I do not know 
whether they say that every major sin takes one outside the fold of Islaam! 
However, they always revolve around certain major sins but remain silent or just 
pass by other major sins! And for this reason I do not see that we should make 
this label absolute, and that we should say, ‘They are Khawarj’, 
except from certain aspects. And this is the justice that we have been ordered 
to abide by…" [The Cassette:The Surooriyyah are the Khawarij of the 
Era, end of the first side].
The Text
A person might say, "Why do you always talk about the Mu’tazilah, 
the Jahmiyyah, the Zanadiqah (Heretics), the Ash’aris, the Khawarij and 
the Murji’ah? And why do you always mention them whenever you mention the 
issues of aqidah? Yet these sects have passed and their adherents are now under 
the soil and as it as said: ‘Time has eaten and drunk over it’, 
[hence] there is not real need for this?
We say – and with Allaah lies success -:
Yes, these sects existed in the past and their founders and adherents have 
indeed passed away in the generations that have passed. However, their ideas and 
beliefs themselves have not ceased to exist. Rather, their followers and those 
affected by them are present in our very midst. Hence, their aqidah and their 
ideas have transferred from generation to generation and there are those who 
revive and give strength to such ideas [in subsequent generations].
As for the aqidah of the Mu’tazilah, then it still exists. In fact 
is spread far and wide amongst many of those who attach themselves to Islaam. 
And the Shi’ah, with all their variant groups – even the Zaidiyyah 
– are upon the aqidah of I’tizal.
As for the Ash’aris then this is a sect that has a significant 
presence amongst the main bulk of the Muslims today.